Hello
top of page

Northstar | Aligning planning and better visibility with stronger outcomes

District planning was fragmented across spreadsheets, email threads, and disconnected dashboards -leaving leaders unable to see execution, and schools duplicating work with no shared source of truth.

Role

Lead UX Designer & Researcher

Timeline

12 weeks - Five-phase research & design engagement · 2024

Team

2 Designers
2 Researchers
1 Product Lead
1 Program Sponsor
1 Executive Sponsor

Primary metric

78% ↑ planning efficiency
$1.2M annualized savings

OVERVIEW

The snapshot

Challenge

About 40 schools across the district planned independently, with only 42% cross-school visibility, 74% of planning work happening outside any shared system, and reporting alone consuming 18 hours per administrator every week.

Approach

Led a 12-week, five-phase research engagement covering discovery, analysis, synthesis, validation, alignment, and planning. Worked with 96 participants across district leadership, principals, curriculum teams, and teachers.

Conducted 56 interviews, 5 workshops, and reviewed 120+ planning documents to map the full district planning lifecycle.

Result

Connected goal-setting, curriculum alignment, execution, reporting, and intervention in one platform. Improved planning efficiency from 46% to 82% and cut weekly reporting effort from 18 hours to six.

HERO METRIC

78%

Improvement in planning efficiency

PROBLEM

What was breaking

Fragmented, manual district planning environment showing disconnected spreadsheets, email threads, and duplicate reports before Northstar.

Manual, disconnected processes consumed 74% of planning work, with administrators spending up to 18 hours a week collecting and reconciling reports

Cross-school visibility sat at just 42%, leaving district leaders unable to see execution until problems had already taken hold

Struggling schools waited 4-6 weeks between an issue emerging and support arriving, since intervention depended on manual, after-the-fact reporting

This wasn't a reporting problem. It was an alignment problem.

DISCOVERY

How I learned it

Discover - stakeholder interviews & current-state mapping

Analyze - workflow, governance & information-flow mapping

Synthesize - insight generation & opportunity mapping

Validate - findings review & prioritization with district leaders

Planning happens in silos, with every school inventing its own format

Found in 56 stakeholder interviews across 4 districts

Ownership is ambiguous - no one is clearly accountable for closing the loop

Found in governance mapping & workshop synthesis

Reporting consumes hours but delivers limited strategic value

Found in document analysis & stakeholder survey

INSIGHTS

The moments things clicked

Fragmented planning is the root cause, not the symptom

Schools build plans independently, in inconsistent formats and disconnected tools, so nothing rolls up into a shared district picture.

Leaders can't see execution until it's already a problem

With only 42% cross-school visibility, district leaders learn about at-risk schools weeks after issues emerge, not while there's still time to act.

Hospitals lack real-time visibility and control

Administrators spend up to 18 hours a week compiling updates by hand, time pulled directly from instructional leadership and support.

STRATEGY

How I chose what to build

A compliance workflow so confusing, 1 in 3 users abandoned it mid-form.

A compliance workflow so confusing, 1 in 3 users abandoned it mid-form.

A compliance workflow so confusing, 1 in 3 users abandoned it mid-form.

A compliance workflow so confusing, 1 in 3 users abandoned it mid-form.

A compliance workflow so confusing, 1 in 3 users abandoned it mid-form.

A compliance workflow so confusing, 1 in 3 users abandoned it mid-form.

THE TRADE OFF

A compliance workflow so confusing, 1 in 3 users abandoned it mid-form.

SOLUTION

The final shape of things

1

Six stages, one governed lifecycle

District goals flow into initiatives, school plans, execution, reporting, and intervention through defined ownership, decision rights, and approval gates at every stage - so nothing moves forward without clear accountability.

2

Real-time visibility replaces after-the-fact reporting

District and school dashboards surface initiative progress, curriculum alignment, and at-risk schools as they happen, turning weeks-old status updates into a live, shared picture.

3

Every role sees exactly what it needs

District leaders get enterprise-wide visibility, principals see their school in context, curriculum coordinators see alignment data, and teachers see their classrooms - each with the KPIs and decision authority appropriate to their role.

IMPACT

What actually shifted

78%

Planning efficiency (46% to 82%)

66%

Weekly reporting time (18 to 6 hrs)

138%

Cross-school visibility (42% to 100%)

67%

Intervention speed (4-6 wks to 1-2 wks)

BEFORE

46% planning efficiency

18 hrs/week spent on reporting

42% cross-school visibility

AFTER

82% planning efficiency

6 hrs/week spent on reporting

100% cross-school visibility

As a principal, what I value most about NorthStar is that it gives us a common language. When priorities compete or teams disagree, we can come back to the framework and have a much more productive conversation. It’s helped us move from opinions and assumptions to clearer decisions.

Manny Aloysius | Molehill High School

Curious how this could apply to your system?

REFLECTION

What I'd carry forward

What I'd do differently

I'd pressure-test the governance model with principals and teachers earlier - the planning hierarchy looked clean from the district office, but ownership at the school and classroom level took more iteration than we scoped for.

What this taught me

The recurring theme across every stakeholder group was the same: teams weren't lacking effort, they were lacking a shared system. Once planning, execution, and reporting lived in one place with clear ownership, alignment followed.

bottom of page